I hope all Americans will do everything in their power to introduce the
French metrical system. (...) I look upon our English system as a
wickedly, brain-destroying system of bondage under which we suffer.
The reason why we continue to use it, is the imaginary difficulty of
making a change.
(William THOMSON, Lord Kelvin; Thomson, 1889)
The necessity to unify disparate measures. During Antiquity and the Middle Age, measures of weight, length and duration were varying from one place to another. The first government in History to try and homogenize measures was under king Henri III, in England. The 1297 version of the Magna Carta (originally signed in 1215), expressed the will to define standards for measuring weights and distances. “Article 25. One measure of Wine shall be through our Realm, and one measure of Ale, and one measure of Corn, that is to say, the Quarter of London; and one breadth of dyed Cloth, Russets, and Haberjects, that is to say, two Yards within the lists. And it shall be of Weights as it is of Measures.” The rest of the world kept using different yards and pounds, for several centuries.
Measuring the Earth. In France, the Académie royale des sciences was funded in 1666 by Jean-Baptiste COLBERT, under king Louis XIV, influenced by his secretary for sciences and arts, Charles PERRAULT (Débarbat & Quinn, 2019). In 1667, the royal observatory was created and astronomers were tasked with providing more accurate maps of the realm. Clergyman Jean PICARD performed a series of measures by triangulation, with a unique measuring board, and estimated the size of the Earth (Mesure de la Terre, 1671). During the XVIII century, several scientific expeditions in Latin America or the North Pole (by La Condamine, Maupertuis, et al.) refined the measurement of the size of the Earth and confirmed its flattening around the poles.
The introduction of the metric system. It is only during the French revolution (1789–1799) that the metric system was introduced. It was consistent with its time. It was aimed at erasing differences in an abstract way, with new standards independent of the old human references (foot, inch, etc.). One of its important features was that it was a decimal system, simplifying calculations. It can be traced back to the months before the revolution, in 1789. The cahiers de doléances (register of grievances) expressed the wish to have unified measures throughout the realm. In 1790, Charles-Maurice DE TALLEYRAND-PÉRIGORD, a bishop elected at the recent national assembly, submitted a memoir to adopt a new system of weights and measures, contributed by Marie-Jean-Antoine CRITAT DE CONDORCET and Joseph-Jérôme LEFRANÇOIS DE LALANDE (Débarbat & Quinn, 2019). In 1792, Jean-Baptiste DELAMBRE and Pierre-François MÉCHAIN were charged with measuring the length of the meridian between Dunkerque and Barcelona (Alder, 2015). The definition of the meter was then of the distance between the North Pole and the equator. The kilogram was defined as the mass of one cubic decimeter of water.
Difficulty of adoption. The metric system was not adopted right away, even in France. It was mocked by Napoléon, although Laplace promoted the advantage of its decimal system to him. For a while, we kept “mesure usuelles”, which were a standardization of imperial units. In Germany, around 1830, Carl-Friedrich GAUSS formalized the metric unit system in physics, and proposed to add the seconds to meters and kilograms, leading to the CGS system (Centimetre-Gram-Second). During the 1851 World’s fair in London, France promoted the metric system to the world. It led to the “Treaty of the Metre”, signed in Paris in 1875, by seventeen countries adopting the metric system. Great Britain, the Netherlands and Portugal were opposed. England, in particular, felt that adopting the French system would be a political defeat. A diplomatic solution was proposed in adopting the Greenwich meridian, during the 1883 Geodetic Congress: “The Conference hopes that, if the whole world is agreed upon the unification of longitudes and hours in accepting the Greenwich meridian as the point of departure, Great Britain will find in this fact an additional motive to take on her side new steps in favour of the unification of weights and measures, by joining the Metrical Convention of May 20, 1875” (The Geodetic Congress, 1883). The Greenwich meridian was finally adopted during the 1884 International Meridian Conference, but England did not adopt the metric system…
The international system. Since 1960, the International System of units (SI) is the Meter-Kilogram-Second-Ampere system (MKSA or MKS). Astronomers are one of the last communities to use CGS units (and the Gaussian system for electrodynamics; Table B.4). The continued use of a mix between imperial units and the CGS system is counterproductive. The most dramatic example is the crash of the 1999 Mars Climate Observer probe, because of a conversion mistake between imperial and metric units (Popular Mechanics, 2017). Table B.1 gives the correspondence between the MKS and CGS systems, and Tables B.2 – B.3 list the fundamental constants in both systems. Table B.4 compares the MKSA and Gaussian systems for electrodynamics.
Quantity | International units (MKS) | Astronomer’s units (CGS)
| ||
GENERAL
| ||||
Length | 1 | m (meter) | cm (centimeter) | |
Force | 1 | N (Newton) | dyn (dynes) | |
Energy | 1 | J (joule) | erg | |
Power | 1 | W (watt) | erg/s | |
Flux (1 Jansky) | W/m/Hz | erg/s/cm/Hz | ||
ELECTROMAGNETISM
| ||||
Charge | 1 | C (Coulomb) | esu (electrostatic unit) | |
Current | 1 | A (Ampere) | esu/s | |
Electric potential | 1 | V (volt) | statV (statvolt) | |
Electric field | 1 | V/m | statV/cm | |
Magnetic field | 1 | T (Tesla) | G (Gauss) | |
Magnetic flux | 1 | Wb (Weber) | G.cm | |
Auxiliary field H | 1 | A/m | Oe (Oersted) | |
ANGULAR DISTANCE
| ||||
1 arcsec | rad | |||
1 arcsec at 1 Mpc | 4.848 | pc | ||
|
Quantity | International units (MKS) | Astronomer’s units (CGS)
| ||
UNIVERSAL
| ||||
Light speed, | m/s | cm/s | ||
Newton constant, | m/kg/s | cm/g/s | ||
Planck constant, | J.s | erg.s | ||
| J.s | erg.s | ||
Magnetic constant, | ||||
| N/A | |||
Electric constant, | ||||
| F/m | |||
Elementary charge, | C | esu | ||
ATOMIC
| ||||
Electron mass, | kg | g | ||
| J | erg | ||
| MeV | |||
Proton mass, | kg | g | ||
| J | erg | ||
| GeV | |||
Rydberg, | ||||
| m | cm | ||
| Hz | |||
| J | erg | ||
| eV | |||
MACROSCOPIC
| ||||
Boltzmann constant, | J/K | erg/K | ||
| eV/K | |||
| Hz/K | |||
Atomic mass unit, | ||||
| kg | g | ||
Avogadro number, | mol | |||
Molar gas constant, | ||||
| J/mol/K | erg/mol/K | ||
|
Quantity | International units (MKS) | Astronomer’s units (CGS)
| ||
GENERAL
| ||||
Astronomical unit, | m | cm | ||
Parsec, | m | cm | ||
SOLAR SYSTEM
| ||||
Solar radius, | m | cm | ||
Solar mass, | kg | g | ||
Solar luminosity, | W | erg/s | ||
Earth radius, | m | cm | ||
Earth mass, | kg | g | ||
GALAXY
| ||||
Solar velocity around G.C., | km/s | |||
Distance sun-G.C., | kpc | |||
Local disk density, | kg/m | g/cm | ||
| m | cm | ||
Local halo density, | kg/m | g/cm | ||
| m | cm | ||
COSMOLOGY
| ||||
Hubble expansion rate, | km/s/Mpc | |||
Critical density, | /Mpc | g/cm | ||
Pressureless matter density, | ||||
| ||||
Baryon density, | ||||
Cosmological constant, | ||||
| ||||
|
Quantity | Rationalized MKSA | Gaussian units |
| ||
Lorentz Force | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Dielectric Constant & Permeability | ||
| ||
| ||
Displacement & Magnetic Field | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Maxwell Equations | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Poynting Vector | ||
| ||
| ||
Electromagnetic Power | ||
| ||
| ||
Energy Density | ||
| ||
|
My personal experience in working with units led me to the following advices.
(B.1) |
The underlying probability law is different in both cases. It is preferable to choose a representation of the quantity so that its uncertainty is the closest to a normal law. If we are estimating the uncertainty on a parameter, the dynamical range is important. If a quantity varies by more than one order of magnitude, it is often a good choice to treat the logarithm of this quantity in a Bayesian model. Concerning fluxes, the magnitude system is logarithmic, but it is not a decimal system (it uses a cumbersome 2.5 factor), and it relies on arbitrary zero-point fluxes (cf. Table B.5). The only useful formula concerning magnitudes is to get out of them:
(B.2) |
| Central wavelength, | Zero-point flux, F |
U | 0.36 | 1884 Jy |
B | 0.44 | 4646 Jy |
V | 0.55 | 3953 Jy |
R | 0.66 | 2875 Jy |
I | 0.80 | 2241 Jy |
J | 1.25 | 1602 Jy |
H | 1.60 | 1010 Jy |
K | 2.18 | 630 Jy |
L | 3.45 | 278 Jy |
M | 4.75 | 153 Jy |
N | 10.6 | 36.3 Jy |
|